 |
Shubnum’s Performance
Results
Savings of Taxpayer Dollars
Some of the examples of Shubnum’s performance, which resulted
in savings of taxpayer dollars
|
Acquisition Savings on Public Projects
while meeting all contract requirements and not deleting
any content or degrading the quality or performance of
the acquisition
Engaging
Agency |
Budgeted
Funds |
Qualified
Acquisition Procured at |
Savings,
Based on
Proprietary
Processes |
Percent
Savings on
Budgeted
Funds |
Calif. State Univ.
Sacramento
Energy Retrofit |
$2,300,000 |
$1,650,000 |
$650,000 Savings
$640,000 Rebates
$1,290,000 Total |
28%
+ 28%
Total: 56% |
Univ of Calif. Med Center,
Telecom
Infrastructure |
$120,000 |
$ 85,000 |
$35,000 |
29% |
Franchise Tax Bd
Data Center |
$1,500,000 |
$334,000 Bid Alt.
$862,000 Base |
$303,000 Bid Alt.
$638,000 Total |
20% + Bid Alt.
42% Total |
Dept. of Justice
Hawkins
Data Center |
$1,200,000 |
$924, 000 |
$276,000 |
23% |
Franchise Tax Bd
Modifications |
$84,000 |
$72,000 |
$12,000 |
14% |
Folsom State
Prison (6 Projects) |
$6,817,000 |
$5,916,599 |
$900,901 |
13% |
TB/HIV
Housing
Renovations |
$
1,010,000 |
$
808,000 |
$
202,000 |
20% |
|
All prime and sub contractors for these projects (except one)
were small businesses. There were more small businesses that participated
than there would have been if the traditional processes were used.
Small businesses, as small as a two-person woman-owned business,
received their first government contract through the use of this
unique process. All businesses indicated that they were more than
satisfied and made a profit |
 |