|
Shubnum's processes play a significant
part in the prudent operations of an organization in the private
and public sector.
These processes reduce the cost of goods
sold (COGS), Materials, Repair and Operating (MRO) supplies,
large capital outlay and continuing operating expenses in a vertical
industry. Such an industry would employ manufacturing as a significant
part of their operation.
The processes also reduces the sales, general
and administrative (SG&A) - operating expenses as well as
large capital outlay for equipment/services/ projects; for organizations
whose primary function is a service, such as a governmental agency.
These reductions are in the range of 8%
to 56% of the funds-currently-budgeted for such activities. Please
refer to the section titled Results.
Note that the savings shown are for single transactions
not accumulated over time nor aggregated over many transactions.
Shubnum's processes have the capability to aggregate such single
transactions, which can affect the performance of an organization
very dramatically.
The savings have a significant positive
affect on the net profit margins for a non-public organization;
taxpayer contributions saved for a public body or a better return
on investment on borrowed funds for a lending agency..
These affects are illustrated in the accompanying
tabulation.
Effect on Earnings
In the accompanying illustration of an
'ABC corporation', the operating expenses are noted to have been
reduced by 12% of the benchmarked operating expenses, prior to
using our processes. This reduction translates as an increase
in earnings by 42% based on the same gross revenue and other
sales, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses.
Such an increase in earnings affects the Price to Earnings (P/E)
ratio in a significant way.
Effect on Capitalization
If the above 'ABC corporation' was an organization
in the vertical industry and the above reductions were in COGS
and/or SG&A, then the increase in the net profit margins
is equivalent to an increase in gross sales revenue growth of
42%, based on constant net profit margin of 10%. A growth of
such magnitude would take a long time in most industries. This
growth may be translated as a 6% growth per year for 7 years.
Based on a rough calculation of the capitalization
of an organization at 3 times the revenue, the corporation increased
its capitalization by $630,000,000
Effect on Economic Value Added (EVA)1
EVA measures the net profits in the context
of the 'true cost of capital employed'. In simple terms, Shubnum's
processes make the existing capital work harder thus increasing
the efficiency and hence the subsequent effect of 'reduced cost
of capital employed'. In other words it takes less capital to
perform the same equivalent-work as it would have, if the strategies
were not employed. This reduction of the cost of capital employed,
enhances the EVA which translates as improved shareholder value.
Our processes have a significant impact
on an organization's EVA.
Prior to an assignment, and with your permission;
we would model your current financials and benchmark them to
compare the affect of implementing our processes in a consistent
manner.
1. Economic Value Added
(EVA) is a registered trademark of Stern Stewart & Co.
Stewart, G.B., The Quest for Value, Harper Business 1991
Shubnum's Effect
on Financial Performance and Market Capitalization
when strategic processes are used consistently |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Reference Averages used
as a basis |
ABC Corp
without using Shubnum Process |

|
Notes for column on right |
ABC Corp
Using Shubnum Process for strategic management |

|
Notes for column on right |
ABC Corp
Using Shubnum Process for strategic management |

|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Effect on Earnings
|
|
Effect on Capitalization
|
(A)
|
Gross Revenue |
|
$500,000,000 |
|
$500,000,000 |
|
$710,000,000 effective increase
of sales by 42% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
Operating
Expenses |
57%
of a |
$285,000,000 |
53% of a |
$264,000,000 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(C)
|
Non Production Expenses (Part of Operating Expenses) |
61%
of b |
$174,000,000 |
58% of b (reduced by $ 21,000,000
12% of $ 174,000,000) |
$153,000,000 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(D)
|
Miscellaneous |
|
constant |
|
constant |
|
constant |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(E)
|
Taxes |
|
constant |
|
constant |
|
increases
slighly |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(F)
|
Net Profit
Margin |
10% of a |
$50,000,000 |
equivalent of 14.2% of a |
$71,000,000 effective earnings
increase by 42% |
basis of 10% of a |
$71,000,000 normalized earnings
at original rate of 10% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(G)
|
Market Capitalization |
3
x Revenue |
$1.5 billion |
|
|
3x Revenue |
$2.13
billion market cap increase by $630 million |
|
|